Scientific Director • Institute of Living

Vision for Scientific Leadership at the IOL

Reimagining behavioral health innovation with systems, story, and scale—so recovery is not an aspiration, but a measurable design principle embedded in every study, clinic, and community partnership.

My story

From lived experience to lab architecture

My portfolio sits at the intersection of academic precision, trauma science, and narrative design. Every role—Penn, VA, RWJF, national media—has been a laboratory for building infrastructure that treats grief, bias, and trust as variables we can see, model, and repair.

Academic precision

Academic Precision

From Penn to the VA to RWJF, I have architected scalable, grant-producing systems that keep culture, ethics, and community voice at the center of design.

“I don’t just chase funding streams—I build platforms that make recovery a required deliverable.”

Method + mission

A Builder of Pathways, Not Just Programs

Ph.D. with cross-disciplinary roots in health equity, data, and psychosocial science. I specialize in turning isolated pilots into durable ecosystems that crosswalk scholarship, clinical practice, and community accountability.

“The work is successful when communities can feel the research in the way they heal.”

Systems + storytelling

Systems + Storytelling

LiveLab Studios operate as narrative intelligence centers, powering trust metrics, engagement strategies, and qualitative datasets across dialysis centers, barbershops, classrooms, and congregations.

“Where people tell the truth about their pain is where our data should begin.”

Narrative engine

LiveLab Narrative Intelligence

Our framework turns testimony into tagged, analyzable narratives that feed dashboards, grant justifications, and institutional decision-making. Media, metrics, and memory work together as a single recovery engine.

“Stories become protocols, and protocols become proof that the system can change.”

What sets this portfolio apart

Why this Scientific Director seat looks different with me in it

My career has not followed the traditional academic arc. I’ve built labs inside Fortune 500 boardrooms, trauma-healing models inside barbershops, recovery dashboards inside dialysis centers, and data-ready narrative systems inside national media. IOL gains a Scientific Director whose work behaves like a bridge— connecting institutions that rarely sit at the same table, and converting that breadth into stronger science, clearer strategy, and deeper public trust.

IOL expectation

Accelerate national visibility and high-value research pipelines

IOL needs recognizable scientific leadership—someone who can elevate the institution, attract competitive funding, and anchor its presence in national conversations on trauma, recovery, and psychiatric innovation.

My track record

I built national authority through award-winning scholarship, $1.25M+ in interdisciplinary grants, and a public voice trusted by NBC, NPR, and Congressional partners. My work routinely turns complex health issues into accessible narratives that resonate with funders, clinicians, and policymakers.

IOL expectation

Build real partnerships across neighborhoods and health systems

IOL’s next phase requires a Scientific Director who can create durable, trust-based collaborations beyond the walls of the hospital—especially in communities most affected by trauma and chronic disease.

My track record

My partnership model spans caregivers, congregations, community health workers, dialysis centers, and barbershop circuits across six U.S. cities. These collaborations didn’t just convene people—they produced replicable research pathways, shared governance structures, and measurable recovery signals.

IOL expectation

Convert research into operations, culture, and patient-level change

IOL needs a leader who can turn science into systems—where research doesn’t sit on a shelf but shapes pathways, accountability structures, training, and everyday practice.

My track record

From UPenn to the VA to multi-state hospital networks, I’ve built tools that redesign care: trauma indices adopted by service lines, referral pathways that shift based on recovery signals, and learning environments that make equity measurable and repeatable. My work consistently moves institutions from “projects” to performance systems.

Vision

Center for Healing + Narrative Science

At IOL, this vision crystallizes into a Center that treats narrative and recovery as co-equal with diagnosis and treatment. Each product card below represents a core asset in the Scientific Director portfolio.

Flagship tool

BHPHI — Behavioral Health Public Health Index

A citywide index that tracks trauma, trust, and resilience at the zip-code level. BHPHI integrates EHR signals, community narratives, and psychosocial indicators into a single, visually rich score that leadership can read by neighborhood, service line, and demographic group—with LiveLab Studio visualizations updating in real time.

Zip-code dashboards · Trauma density · Recovery readiness

Scholars & safety

Controversial Researcher Recovery Program

An internal protection and restoration pipeline for researchers whose equity-focused or politically sensitive work exposes them to risk. The program offers recovery coaching, institutional backing, media and legal strategy, and leadership narratives that clearly state: IOL stands with courageous science.

Safety protocols · Coaching · Institutional messaging

Community circuits

Community Townhalls & Narrative Salons

Storytelling salons, recovery concerts, and trauma–trust audits across Hartford neighborhoods. Each convening feeds the Trauma & Trust Index, turning microphones and stages into structured inputs for research design, grant aims, and institutional accountability.

LiveLab formats · Trauma & Trust Index · Repair playbooks

Comparative model

Benchmarked Center of Excellence

A comparative architecture that learns from Mass General’s Center for Cross-Cultural Student Emotional Wellness, Yale’s Program for Recovery & Community Health, and NYU’s McSilver Institute—then advances the field by anchoring those insights in narrative-backed recovery protocols, psychiatric depth, and measurable equity outcomes.

Peer benchmarking · Recovery protocols · Equity outcomes

Explore the portfolio behind this vision: training, grants, media, and systems design.

What IOL needs ↔ what this role delivers

Aligning Institute needs with Scientific Director delivery.

This grid makes the role legible: every strategic need at the Institute of Living is mapped directly to a proven capability I bring into the Scientific Director portfolio.

Scale external funding portfolio

IOL needs a Scientific Director who can expand grants, philanthropic partnerships, and cross-institutional collaborations without sacrificing mission integrity.

Documented capacity

$1.25M+ secured via NIH, RWJF, and major foundations, with platforms that integrate community voice, trauma science, and operational KPIs from the outset.

Anchor a national trauma & healing research center

IOL needs a visible, credible hub for racial trauma, behavioral health, and recovery science that can stand alongside leading national centers.

Proven platform design

Designed & executed LiveLab and Recovery Salons in 6+ cities, combining townhalls, data capture, and media strategy into a single, replicable research engine.

Translate scholarship into measurable impact

IOL needs scholarship that leaves the page: tools that convert studies into dashboards, indices, and interventions clinicians and communities can feel.

Tools in hand

BHPHI Index, Data Trust Auditor, and storytelling-informed interventions that make trauma density, trust gaps, and recovery readiness legible in real time.

Mentor equity-minded clinical scientists

IOL needs a Scientific Director who can recruit, protect, and grow a pipeline of scholars committed to justice-centered behavioral health.

Pipeline leadership

Built pathways that include K awardees, VA fellows, and DEI leaders, pairing methodological rigor with safety infrastructure for equity-focused scholarship.

Advance trust, equity, and institutional visibility

IOL needs to be seen—and trusted—as a leader in trauma, equity, and recovery, locally and nationally.

National footprint

Work cited by NBC, NPR, APA, and other national platforms; led townhalls and media campaigns that turn visibility into durable trust with patients, families, and clinicians.

Every row is a promise: a need named, a delivery mechanism already tested.

What drives this vision

Designing behavioral health leadership around recovery, trauma, and story.

Our most vital health systems deserve more than innovation. They deserve precision, courage, and vision.

Pillar 01 — Recovery

Recovery as a Design Principle

I build labs, dashboards, and townhalls that treat recovery as a measurable outcome—not an afterthought.

Pillar 02 — Trauma

Trauma as a System Variable

Grief, stigma, and bias are not “soft” factors; they are structural inputs that can be modeled, funded, and repaired.

Pillar 03 — Story

Story as Scientific Evidence

When patients, families, and communities tell us what hurts, they are giving us data. I design systems that listen and act.

How the vision becomes an operating system

A six-step blueprint for turning behavioral health vision into measurable practice.

Each step is an activation point—from lab design to national platforms—that can be phased, funded, and evaluated. Together, they form a coherent operating system for trauma, recovery, and trust at the Institute of Living.

Step01
Lab architecture

Build the Radical Recovery Lab

Design thinking meets data ethics; healing architecture meets analytics. The Lab becomes the physical and conceptual home for radical recovery science, where space, staffing, and study design are all wired to protect and restore.

Foundation
Step02
Scholar safety

Launch the Controversial Researcher Recovery Program

Safety infrastructure, advisory, and communications support for scholars targeted for equity work. The program protects careers, stabilizes labs, and signals that IOL stands with researchers doing courageous science.

Protection
Step03
Index & insight

Implement BHPHI: Behavioral Health Public Health Index

Real-time data on trauma density, trust gaps, and recovery readiness. BHPHI turns stories, encounters, and outcomes into an index leadership can track across units, neighborhoods, and time.

Measurement
Step04
Community circuits

Activate Hartford Townhalls & Narrative Salons

Modeled on LiveLab’s barbershop healing circuits, Hartford townhalls and salons surface story-driven insights. They become recurring touchpoints where community voice is coded into the Lab’s data and IOL’s decision-making.

Engagement
Step05
Model crosswalk

Crosswalk Yale, UCSF, RWJF Models

Strategic comparison and local implementation plan that respects IOL’s context. National exemplars are crosswalked with Hartford’s realities, producing a roadmap that is ambitious, realistic, and funded.

Calibration
Step06
National stage

Scale to National Platforms & Keynotes

Disseminate tools via APA, ANA, AAMC, and regional consortia with measurable adoption. The Lab’s work becomes a beacon—with IOL seen not just as a participant, but as an architect of recovery science.

Amplification

How this role operates in the real world

Precision meets purpose: systems, story, and scale in one portfolio.

This Scientific Director vision braids academic rigor, operational design, and narrative power into a single, accountable practice of leadership.

Academic precision
Systems-level research

Academic Precision

Multimodal researcher, NIH/RWJF platform architect, $12M+ in research leadership.

I build systems that understand grief as a variable—and fund recovery as a deliverable.

From grant to impact

From Grant Strategy to Measurable Recovery

Study design, data governance, and recovery endpoints are aligned from day one, so external funding and community benefit move in lockstep.

Precision here means every funded project is accountable to the people who live the data.

Systems + storytelling
LiveLab Studios

Systems + Storytelling

LiveLab Studios convert trauma into trust metrics, narrative into indexed data.

Our media labs run in barbershops, classrooms, dialysis centers—where people trust us first.

Narrative analytics

Narrative as a Live Data Feed

Story is captured, coded, and replayed as dashboards leaders can act on— turning qualitative testimony into quantitative readiness signals.

The spaces where people open up become the places where institutions learn to repair.

Equity-to-action
Referee Framework

Equity-to-Action

Creator of the Referee Framework: strategic empathy tools for leaders translating DEI into operations.

Equity is a verb. My frameworks move it from keynote to KPI.

Operational playbooks

From Values Language to Operating Rules

Leaders receive playbooks that hard-wire fairness into hiring, referral patterns, incident response, and research participation—measured over time.

If equity doesn’t show up on a scorecard, it rarely shows up in the lived experience.

Organizational turnaround
Cross-sector repair

Organizational Turnaround

Led cross-sector recovery initiatives across six U.S. cities—integrating policy, healing, and story.

When institutions stall on equity, I bring a blueprint that builds and repairs in real time.

Recovery design

From Crisis to Credible Recovery

Governance, messaging, and community partnerships are aligned so that apologies, investments, and policy shifts land as credible repair—not just crisis management.

Turnaround work is only complete when communities can see themselves in the new design.

National trust, measured
Media + metrics

National Trust, Measured

National media, townhalls, and indices that track how trust moves with every intervention.

Visibility is not the goal—verified trust is.

Reputation engine

A Reputation Engine for Healing Institutions

Benchmarking, dashboards, and narrative audits let IOL see how its work lands locally, regionally, and nationally—so every story told is backed by data.

When trust becomes a tracked asset, leadership decisions change.

Hover or tap a tile to see how precision turns into practice.
Dashboard live preview
Scroll down. Explore and play with the sample dashboards—no clicks required, just interaction.

Performance Benchmarks (Full KPI Matrix)

Gold-standard metrics aligned with NIH, RWJF, academic–community consortia, and national psychiatric research centers.

Grant Administration
External Grants Awarded
Y1: 2–4  •  Y3: 8–12
Matches NIH early-stage center growth velocity
Grant Administration
New Research Funding Secured
Y1: $500K–$1M • Y3: $2M–$3M
Includes NIH, RWJF, foundation diversification
Grant Administration
Unique Funding Partners
Y1: 1–2 • Y3: 4–6
NIMHD + Alzheimer’s + corporate behavioral health
Faculty Talent Development
Faculty in Grant Development Pipeline
Y1: 5–10 • Y3: 15–20
Interprofessional workforce model
Faculty Talent Development
Junior Faculty with Independent Awards
Y1: 2–3 • Y3: 8–10
Aligned with NIH K-series benchmarks
Faculty Talent Development
Annual Publications (Center Affiliated)
Y1: 5–8 • Y3: 15–20
Emerging-center standard productivity
Community Engagement
Townhalls & Public Events
Y1: 2–3 • Y3: 8–10
CDC/RWJF community healing benchmarks
Community Engagement
Community Partnerships
Y1: 3–5 • Y3: 10+
NOBLE, NMA/NNA, Weathering Lab, barbershop coalitions
Community Engagement
Earned Media Placements
Y1: 2–4 • Y3: 6–12
Local + national footprint
National Platform
National Keynotes
Y1: 3–5 • Y3: 8–12
Thought leadership index
National Visibility
Signature Initiatives Launched
Y1: 0–1 • Y3: 2–3
Brain–Kidney Axis • Weathering Lab CT
National Visibility
Fellows / Trainee Cohorts
Y1: 4–6 • Y3: 10–15
LDI- & ICubed-modeled certification pathways
I AM Research Group

A research lineage built on rigor, recovery, and rising scholars.

The I AM Research Group is the backbone of my academic DNA—22 formally trained scholars from undergraduate to postdoc at the University of Pennsylvania, each shaped through precision mentorship, narrative science, and trauma-informed research design. This is the model I bring to the Institute of Living: a lab culture where inquiry, protection, and excellence travel together.

I AM Research Group

Training scholars who turn evidence into equity

The I AM Research Group is a living lab for health equity, narrative science, and policy practice. From classroom to capitol, we mentor students, scaffold careers, and design applied experiences that make inclusion the organizing principle of research—not an afterthought.

Impact snapshot
Learners across medicine, nursing & public health
National review panels & professional service
Policy-engaged experiences from Denver to Philadelphia
Hands-on work with leading health equity institutions
Scholars & trainees

Mentoring the next generation of health equity leaders

Students in the I AM Research Group move beyond term papers and slide decks. They co-design surveys, moderate focus groups, and help build data stories that end up in clinics, community organizations, and board rooms. Our alumni step into medical school, nursing programs, doctoral training, public policy fellowships, and health system roles with a portfolio of real projects that already changed something for patients and communities.

Clinical trainees · policy fellows · community-based researchers

Service to the profession

Review panels, roundtables & national convenings

I AM Research treats professional service as curriculum. Our team contributes to journal review panels, advisory boards, and national working groups, giving students a front-row seat to how ideas become guidelines, grants, and practice standards. We extend this ethic of service to spaces like the American Nurses Association, specialty societies, and interdisciplinary equity commissions.

Peer review · advisory boards · professional societies

National platforms

From social media feeds to legislative language

Our work shows up where decisions are made. The group has supported social media and digital storytelling for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Health Equity Roundtable, volunteered at the National Medical Association Meeting in Philadelphia, and contributed expertise that has been referenced in legislative documents. Students learn how a single brief, infographic, or thread can shift how leaders talk about justice.

NASEM Roundtable · NMA Meeting · policy citations

Applied policy labs

Where health policy meets real people

I AM Research builds embedded learning experiences that make policy tangible. From collaborative health policy projects with the City of Denver, to hospitality and recovery-focused work with the Penn Transplant House, to facilitating Penn’s own Health Equity Roundtable, students see how research questions move through city halls, hospital corridors, and community partners. Every project returns to the same question: how does this decision land on a real body, in a real zip code?

City partnerships · Penn Transplant House · Health Equity Roundtable

Where chronic disease and trauma are modeled together

The Brain–Kidney Axis Lab

Chronic disease and trauma don’t just overlap—they speak to each other. We model how racial grief increases renal strain and neural inflammation.

This lab integrates narrative data, EHR analysis, and biosocial trauma markers. We track how stories of loss, racism, and chronic stress show up as patterns in dialysis chairs, waiting rooms, and imaging studies.

Axis Fellowship: An 18-month track for junior scholars researching trauma–comorbidity with precision and justice.

Brain · Kidney · Story
Neurobiology, nephrology, and narrative in one lab.
I AM Research Lab • Vision Series

Luxury-Grade Science, Built for Impact

Six flagship initiatives that position the Institute as a national studio for trauma, chronic disease, workforce performance, and ethical AI.

Axis initiative

Brain–Kidney Axis Initiative

Exploring the underrecognized neuro-nephrological pathways in chronic disease, with implications for aging and equity-focused intervention models.

Research protections

Safeguarding Bold Research

Guiding institutions in developing psychosocial protections for researchers investigating polarizing or high-risk topics, from racial trauma to institutional accountability.

Embedded hubs

Centers of Healing Science

Modeling after top-tier psychiatric units (e.g., IOL), we support systems in developing embedded research hubs that connect equity, neuroscience, and patient experience.

Pathways design

Mental Health Care Funnel

Collaborative strategies that direct community-based research findings into tiered psychiatric interventions—triaging urgent care, outpatient models, and community healing labs.

Workforce labs

Neuroperformance in Workplaces

Deploying brain-based performance strategies to reduce burnout, support BIPOC staff resilience, and align organizational change with neuroscience.

AI signal studios

AI + Mental Health Signal Labs

Integrating biometric signal labs and AI to track, assess, and intervene on stress, trauma, and recovery across high-stakes sectors—grounded in ethical design principles.

Why Choose Dr. Kevin Ahmaad Jenkins

Why Choose Dr. Kevin Ahmaad Jenkins

Because this role demands more than a researcher. It demands a builder, a listener, a strategist, and a steward of recovery science. I bring a proven national portfolio—labs, grants, students, models, and systems—ready to scale at IOL.

See the Case for Selection

The Case for Leadership

The Institute of Living deserves a Scientific Director who understands that trauma, trust, and healing must be engineered—not hoped for. My work unites rigorous science with narrative precision, institutional recovery, and a training pipeline that has formally developed 22 scholars from undergraduate to postdoc at Penn.

Proven National Impact

I have shaped research portfolios across Penn, the VA, RWJF, and national institutions—leading, supporting, or collaborating on more than $1.25M in funded research while building frameworks that strengthen equity, compliance, and institutional resilience.

A Real Training Pipeline

Leadership is not a title—it’s who you develop. Through the I AM Research Group, I have formally mentored and trained 22 rising scholars across disciplines, producing researchers who now serve in medicine, public health, policy, and behavioral science. IOL gains not just a director, but a pipeline.

Recovery as a System

I bring LiveLab Studios, the Behavioral Health Public Health Index, narrative diagnostics, and trauma-aware operational playbooks—tools that convert patient stories, community grief, and clinical realities into measurable recovery architecture.

Kevin communicated complex and consequential topics with clarity and authenticity. His sense of humor and insight made challenging issues easier to understand and act upon.
— Past President, American Neurological Association