Illustrative staff planning collaborative research

Regional Engagement / Colleges & Universities

Build the relationship.
Expand what’s possible.

I AM is developing regional partnerships that connect institutional strengths, scholar opportunities, and consequential research. We invite colleges and universities to help shape the work through clearly defined agreements.

Proposed national footprint · Institutional conversations welcome · Agreements developed individually

National ambition / Local relationships

A shared research home.
A partnership grounded in purpose.

The value of connection

Your institution brings
strength. We build
around it.

A strong partnership starts with a specific opportunity: scholars who need methods support, a question that needs collaborators, or a community priority that deserves a rigorous study. We develop the scope together.

For scholars

More ways to develop.

Explore mentorship, paid research pathways, writing support, and intellectual exchange across institutions.

For institutions

More capacity to build.

Connect research teams with study-development support, grant collaboration, and tailored methods training.

For communities

More useful evidence.

Develop questions with local partners and plan how findings will return to the people and organizations involved.

Our organizing framework

Six regions.
One shared standard.

The map organizes outreach across the United States. Relationships will grow around participating institutions, funded projects, and locally informed priorities.

I AM proposed regional footprint: Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, West, and Mountain/Plains

Proposed engagement footprint. The map does not indicate established offices, signed institutional agreements, or active research sites. Region boundaries are outreach groupings.

Illustrative research staff developing a study plan together

A partnership is a working relationship

Bring your strengths.
Build the next
possibility together.

Partnership models

Choose a starting point.
Build a useful scope.

These proposed models can be combined in an institutional agreement. Each initiative needs a defined lead, resources, responsibilities, and a realistic timeline.

01 / Scholar pathways

Scholar Development Partnership

Connect students, postdoctoral scholars, and faculty to future fellowship opportunities, mentor exchanges, and writing support.

Define together

Shared recruitment and referral pathways; funded placements agreed separately.

02 / Methods capacity

Methods & Training Partnership

Co-design research-team training, faculty development, or a People’s Lab immersion around the institution’s needs.

Define together

Learning objectives, delivery format, participant support, and evaluation.

03 / Research collaboration

Collaborative Research Partnership

Develop studies, funding proposals, or evaluations with complementary expertise and locally informed questions.

Define together

Scientific leadership, budgets, ethics responsibilities, data arrangements, and outputs.

04 / Public exchange

Regional Convening Partnership

Host research exchanges, future summits, methods demonstrations, or public dialogues connecting scholars and communities.

Define together

Defined audience, host responsibilities, access arrangements, and production scope.

05 / Community engagement

Community Research Partnership

Bring community organizations into question development, participant engagement, and interpretation of findings.

Define together

Participation roles, compensation where budgeted, feedback, and return of findings.

An institutional partnership does not automatically confer funding, academic credit, accreditation, or access to protected data. Those arrangements require specific commitments and approvals.

From conversation to agreement

An MOU should
make the next step
clear.

A memorandum of understanding can establish the shared purpose and coordination framework. Funded projects, fellow placements, credit arrangements, or data exchange may require separate agreements appropriate to the activity.

Our proposed process starts with a focused conversation, a short concept note, and review by the people authorized to make institutional commitments.

A practical development process

Build deliberately.
Activate with clarity.

We want relationships that translate into useful work, with an identifiable next step at every stage.

01

Connect

Identify priorities, institutional strengths, and the people who should join the conversation.

02

Shape

Develop a concept note with activities, resources, intended outcomes, and a proposed timeline.

03

Agree

Review the MOU and identify any additional project, appointment, funding, or data agreements.

04

Activate & learn

Launch approved activities, review milestones, and assess what scholars and partners gain.

Illustrative young scholars working with research data

Institutional strengths / Shared opportunity

The next discovery
begins with connection.

Build a pathway for your scholars, a collaboration for your team, and a stronger return from the work.

Illustrative research assistants supporting participant engagement

Regional Partnership Representatives

Be the connection
in your region.

Our developing representative network will recruit prospective scholars, strengthen institutional relationships, and connect regional opportunities to the institute’s research team.

Recruit talent

Connect prospective fellows and People’s Lab participants with appropriate pathways.

Develop relationships

Engage colleges, universities, health systems, and community organizations.

Identify opportunities

Surface studies, grant collaborations, training needs, and funding introductions.

Keep work connected

Coordinate next steps with institute leads and participating institutions.

Representatives develop relationships and referrals. Award selection, scientific review, and institutional agreements remain with designated institute and partner authorities. Engagement terms will be discussed individually.

Do you already have partner institutions in each region?

The map is a proposed engagement framework. Confirmed partnerships will be described publicly only after an agreement is completed and public acknowledgement is authorized.

Can a partnership include university credit?

It may, if an accredited institution approves the curriculum, assessment, faculty responsibilities, and credit arrangement. An MOU alone does not create academic credit.

Can we commission research without a broader MOU?

Yes. An institution can discuss a defined research, grant-development, evaluation, or training engagement through Research & Partnerships. The agreement will reflect the scope of that work.

What should we include in an initial inquiry?

Send your institution, role, location, research or training priorities, prospective participants, timing, and any identified resources. Tell us who should be involved in the next conversation.

Colleges. Universities. Communities.

Let’s build
a partnership
worth sustaining.

Bring a question, a scholar-development priority, or an institutional strength. We will work together to identify a concrete starting point.